Special Issue Call for Papers - New directions in health-environment research
摘要截稿: 2018-08-27
全文截稿: 2019-02-05
影响因子: 3.616
期刊难度:
CCF分类: 无
中科院JCR分区:
• 大类 : 医学 - 2区
• 小类 : 公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生 - 1区
• 小类 : 社会科学:生物医学 - 1区
Overview
In the last 15 years, scholars have bridged interests in bodies, health/disease, and environments to form a broad, loosely defined, body of scholarship on health-environment interactions. This literature extends work by nature/society geographers on the sociality of nature, and conceptualizes (un)healthy bodies as ‘environments’ or ‘socio-biological’ phenomenon that warrant greater attention and interest from the sub-discipline. Thus feminist insights that a critical scale of analysis is the body and its own set of situated knowledges has come to be a defining feature of this work (Parr 2002; Hayes-Conroy 2015; Jackson and Neely 2016). Consequently, scholars have endeavored to situate health outcomes as important (yet often overlooked) nature-society issues (Mansfield 2008). Together, this research positions environmental, health, and bodily ‘states’ as dynamic entities that are iteratively constituted by everything from political economies to discourses, to lively, material and affective happenings. Clearly, this work has been defined by theoretical and methodological pluralism, and we seek to further widen these engagements in this special issue ofSocial Science & Medicine.
We are specifically looking to round out a set of papers from the Association of American Geographer’s 2018 Annual Meeting with a few more articles that advance health-environment studies by drawing on innovative methods, theoretical frameworks, and/or underexplored themes/empirics. We encourage pieces that either use established approaches in new ways or develop new approaches by marshalling insights from fields such as STS, medical anthropology, histories of science/medicine, and feminist science studies. We also push contributors to explore the points of encounter and contradiction between different approaches such as production of health/disease, social constitutions of nature/biology, affect/non-representational theory, and relational ontologies/socionatural bodies. More importantly, we hope to further discussions of how methodological and theoretical pluralism in health-environment studies might be more effectively deployed to create socially and environmentally just geographies.
Potential papers could explore areas that have been relatively undertheorized in health-environment studies, including but not limited to:
- Subjectivities and assemblages of well-being and dis-ease
- Mental health/emotional geographies
- Chemical landscapes and contested environmental illnesses
- Epigenetics, gene-environment interactions, and plastic/permeable bodies
- The politics of (biomedical and bodily) knowledge and politics of diagnosis